Cd Gree Reported The Case Of The Outstanding Government Lawyer Cries Very Absurd

of social concern Gree reported the Government's "annulment case" on Dec. 30 at a dramatic scene, the admissibility of the case in Guangzhou Tianhe District People's Court (hereinafter referred to as Milky Way Court) ruled that Guangzhou City Bureau of Finance is not the "annulment case" a "Qualified The defendant "and therefore rejected the claim Gree area, but claimed that the court's decision to lead the way Gree avoided substance. night vision helmet

rotating laser level

Tianhe, Guangzhou Bureau of Finance is not the court ruled that "the proper defendant"



"Annulment case" for trial, the defendant, Guangzhou City Bureau of Finance Bureau in response that the reconsideration decision made not to change the original Complaints Treatment decisions based on findings of fact and law, so its not a proper defendant in the case, the plaintiff Gree disagree with the results in terms of, should the decision to prosecute to the original complaint handling agencies (Panyu District Financial Bureau); and Gree asserts that it is Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Finance of the reconsideration decision, a decision to change the original complaint identified the main facts, but also increase the number of invoked the law to change the original complaint handling decisions based on the applicable law.



Tianhe District Court hearing that the Guangzhou Bureau of Finance did not change the original decision of the reconsideration decision, found the main facts and evidence, not many reference articles on the qualitative impact of Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Finance therefore not the proper defendant in this case. The plaintiff in Guangzhou City Finance Bureau filed the case for the proper defendant in the proceedings on the ground does not hold, so the court rejected the plaintiff's prosecution.



Gree: avoid ruling on substantive issues



Case the plaintiff, Guangzhou Geli Air conditioning Liao Hai Gu attorney that the Milky Way Court ruled that "incredible": "Two months ago 'annulment case' and registered the time, Gree aspects of on and off the court the issue at the court concluded that the Gree litigation request meets the conditions placed on file, which means the identity of the accused was found. "



Valley Liao Hai said, "whether the defendant simply a question of when the defendant" has become the ruling of the results, which itself is "very ridiculous, is a waste of law enforcement resources", the ruling "is the essence of the case does not touch "behavior.



He stressed that the Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Finance as the defendant, consistent interpretation of the provisions of the relevant High Court, but the next step will likely to continue the proceedings, does not rule out "other options a court fight the lawsuit" as well. Guangzhou Geli



manager Chen Yong said the Ministry of Justice on this afternoon, "annulment case" pronounced the results surprised, "really a little surprised, when then placed on file problems, did not think this time it turned out."



Chen Yong said the court in determining the case the plaintiff, defendant, claims, evidence, all parties to meet before he is placed on file, although the defendant Gree also considered the subject, but notice has been clearly placed on file The identity of the defendant's principal decision "avoids the real issues, perhaps they do not want to face." Yong also denied the Gree



setback "annulment case": "determination to resolve procedural issues, the verdict was touched that the real problem, but ruled this afternoon." He also said the retention and further additional Gree Claimant The right amount, "does not exclude an increase in the next proceedings in the amount of the claim", but it will be only after consultation with counsel to determine the specific measures taken the next step.