Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Energy companies scramble for 80 billion yuan garbage power market - waste incineration power generation, Energy - Electric Industry


China Suppliers
China Suppliers

Click to see more exciting information


Although waste incineration power generation projects frequently triggered mass conflict Energy The company's investment enthusiasm remains unabated.



rope hoists


Last week, the Inner Mongolia Energy Co., Ltd. invested 386 million yuan Pratt, in Baotou city broke ground on construction of garbage power plant. Earlier, the China Everbright International (00257.HK) about 900 million yuan investment in Jinan City, the construction of a second Solid Waste Treatment Plant energy project also announced construction.
electric chain hoists





Listed companies involved in waste incineration power generation earlier TEDA share (000652.SZ) investment in higher spirits. The company won the bid last year, the Dalian municipal solid waste incineration power generation projects are progressing steadily.





Input could solve pollution From 2001, TEDA shares started to intervene in garbage incineration power generation projects. As a local listed company in Tianjin, TEDA share the first item selected dual port incineration plant in Tianjin. That total investment of 5.4 billion, completed in October 2004.





The end of 2008, two power plants in Hong Kong and garbage harmless disposal garbage accumulated 400 thousand tons, 129 million degrees to achieve power generation, Internet power 108 million degrees. As the project proceeds well, decided to share TEDA Other Urban layout. Last year in June, TEDA share to total investment of 657 million yuan bid for Dalian Solid Waste Incineration City Center project. TEDA shares previously general manager of Wushu Tong





accept the "First Financial Daily" interview that the disposal of several ways, the most advantage of waste incineration power generation, because without any pre-processing residue after burning only the original waste 10% to 15%.





But the company must face a difficult problem?? How to solve the waste incineration process 2! F England. For waste incineration process, there is a big country differences. According to Mao Ping, SW analysts, the composition of domestic solid waste, food waste accounts for more than 50%, due to the higher water content, low caloric value, a variety of toxic gases produced by burning currently unable to accurately measure and control burning all around the project forward by people opposed.





"Burning power generation, if the input is large enough, will not produce pollution." Additional resources (000826.SZ) Marketing Department official told a newspaper, if put too much of our investments may lose money.





TEDA share resources Hop plus listed companies involved in waste generation in the field the largest two. The difference is that TEDA share operating power projects, after completion, while the co-construction of additional resources currently provide engineering equipment integration, does not operate after the completion of garbage power generation project.





Present, incineration process is divided into fluidized bed, grate furnace of two industry pros and cons of these two technologies controversial. "Both technologies have their advantages and disadvantages." Additional resources to co-head of marketing, said the above.





Grate furnace process is basically the cost per ton of waste less than 100, but easy to produce large amounts of toxic gases two! F English; grate furnace per ton of garbage costs 150 yuan, though a greater degree avoid two! f-British production, but more complex control system, burning more stringent pre-treatment requirements.





Canadian resources company that should not promote the use of fluidized bed grate furnaces to increase waste combustion efficiency, which on the classification proposed strict requirements.





"From the current run of circulating fluidized bed waste incinerator of view, the usual burning conditions are good, two! F British grate furnace lower than the original production." Universal Energy of Beijing Branch Environmental protection Co., Ltd.

No comments:

Post a Comment